Say’s Law of Markets: Examining the Core Tenet of Liberal Economics


Jean-Baptiste Say’s Law of Markets, articulated in 1803, stands as one of the fundamental principles in economic theory. Despite facing criticism from Keynes, this law has found favor among neoliberal economists, reasserting itself as a pillar of liberal economic thought. This article explores the essence of Say’s Law, its historical context, and the critiques it has endured over time.

Say’s Law of Markets: Production Creating its Own Demand

Jean-Baptiste Say’s Law posits a critical idea in economic dynamics: “It is production that opens up markets for products. The mere fact of creating a product immediately opens up markets for other products.”

In essence, this law contends that supply generates its own demand. Any new production initiates an income distribution that facilitates the sale of that production.

If one envisions an economy where an individual is both the producer and consumer, the logical demonstration of this law becomes apparent. The producer can sell the product and, with the earned money, become a consumer, thus creating a market for the produced goods.

The Fundamental Doctrine?

Say’s Law represents the explicit quintessence of the liberal doctrine of market equilibrium and the supposed impossibility of overproduction or underconsumption crises.

It aims to demonstrate that a market economy self-regulates in a competitive environment, implying that the state’s role should be as limited as possible.

Additionally, it suggests that exchanges occur through goods rather than involving the neutrality of money, aligning with another liberal tenet: the neutrality of currency.

Keynesian Critique: Challenging the Law of Say

Keynes fundamentally challenged Say’s Law in his works, presenting a contrasting view where production and income do not automatically adjust.

Contrary to Say’s supply-oriented economy, Keynes introduced a demand-driven economic perspective. Anticipated demand becomes the driving force behind production.

Companies produce less if they expect insufficient demand, necessitating governmental and legal interventions to ensure adequate demand through measures like minimum wages, public employment, and allowances. Keynes also contested the neutrality of money, proposing that it could be demanded for reasons beyond transactions, leading to a preference for liquidity and hoarding.

Post-Keynesian Influence: The Law’s Resurgence

Despite Keynesian critiques, and with the decline of Keynesianism, Say’s Law regained prominence as the theoretical foundation for “supply-side policies” dominating economic strategies since the 1980s. These policies prioritize businesses, producers, and investors, placing them at the forefront of economic policymaking.

The Law’s Controversies and Economic Realities

While Say’s Law presents an appealing framework for market equilibrium, it faces challenges and controversies. Keynesian principles gained traction during crises, questioning the inherent stability asserted by Say’s Law. The global economic landscape, marked by diverse structures and growth rates, adds complexity to the universality of Say’s Law.

Conclusion: Say’s Law in Contemporary Economic Discourse

In conclusion, the law of markets proposed by Jean-Baptiste Say remains a significant aspect of economic thought, embodying the liberal doctrine of self-regulating markets.

Despite Keynesian criticism, the law’s resurgence in recent decades indicates its enduring influence. As economic realities evolve, the interplay between supply and demand continues to shape economic policies, keeping Say’s Law a subject of study and debate in contemporary economic discourse.

Understanding the historical context, critiques, and the evolving role of this law provides insights into the foundations of economic theories that have shaped policy decisions for centuries.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here